Changes

"behold": Possibilities include "at that moment" (when timing has significance), "rejoice" (when it is celebratory in nature), "observe" (when the attention of bystanders is relevant), "listen" ....
Line 17: Line 17:  
#How should we cite the [[Conservative Bible]]?  As "CB", or as a more common three-letter acronym like "CBP" (for "Conservative Bible Project," to emphasize its dynamic quality), or perhaps "CPB" ("CP" being the abbreviation for Conservapedia)
 
#How should we cite the [[Conservative Bible]]?  As "CB", or as a more common three-letter acronym like "CBP" (for "Conservative Bible Project," to emphasize its dynamic quality), or perhaps "CPB" ("CP" being the abbreviation for Conservapedia)
 
#Shall we overcome language differences by using a form of "triangulation" to render alternative translations of the same word depending on context, as in "In the beginning was the Living Word, and its logic was with God, and this Truth was God." (John 1:1)?
 
#Shall we overcome language differences by using a form of "triangulation" to render alternative translations of the same word depending on context, as in "In the beginning was the Living Word, and its logic was with God, and this Truth was God." (John 1:1)?
−
#The word "behold" appears frequently in the [[KJV]] but lacks a modern equivalent.  Is there a strategy for this dealing with this concept?  Possibilities include "rejoice", "observe", "listen", "note that", and ignoring it altogether (which modern versions often do).
+
#The word "behold" appears frequently in the [[KJV]] but lacks a modern equivalent.  Is there a strategy for this dealing with this concept?  Possibilities include "at that moment" (when timing has significance), "rejoice" (when it is celebratory in nature), "observe" (when the attention of bystanders is relevant), "listen" (when preaching), "note that" (when an intellectual point is being made), and ignoring it altogether (which modern versions often do, but is disfavored as a translation technique).
 
#Should the feminization of male nouns, as in "prophetess", be used?  Note that [[Michele Bachmann]] prefers to be called "Congressman", because the office has a unique title and that title itself is male in gender, as in "sportsman" or "strawman".
 
#Should the feminization of male nouns, as in "prophetess", be used?  Note that [[Michele Bachmann]] prefers to be called "Congressman", because the office has a unique title and that title itself is male in gender, as in "sportsman" or "strawman".
 
#"Elizabeth" or "Elisabeth" in Chapter 1 of Luke?
 
#"Elizabeth" or "Elisabeth" in Chapter 1 of Luke?
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits