Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,396
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Blocking policy (view source)
Revision as of 03:46, July 19, 2011
, 03:46, July 19, 2011→5 year blocks
::Not often. It can happen in some circumstances, but it's not routine.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:33, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
::Not often. It can happen in some circumstances, but it's not routine.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:33, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
:::Yes there may be a need to block a sock-plant that's been inactive and never used opver time, but I've seen too many usaer accounts blocked minutes after being created. It can be because someone isn't using checkuser properly, or there's just a controversy in the air an someone doesn't want to deal with questions avbout it. If good faith is expected of users, good faith should be exhibited by sysops by ''not'' being suspicious of every new acounbt registered. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:46, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
:::To my mind the only situation where such a block would be acceptable would be a username-related offense, in which case obviously the IP should '''not''' be blocked.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 23:43, 18 July 2011 (EDT)
:::To my mind the only situation where such a block would be acceptable would be a username-related offense, in which case obviously the IP should '''not''' be blocked.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 23:43, 18 July 2011 (EDT)