Changes

But if you have opinions about other contributors '''as people''', they don't belong there - or frankly, anywhere on Conservapedia.  

But if you have opinions about other contributors '''as people''', they don't belong there - or frankly, anywhere on Conservapedia.  

A project like this prospers on people working together toward improving articles. Anything else--especially attacks directed specifically at users--detracts from the wonderful thing that we are creating here. Do not try to advance or defend your argument, idea, or position by posting ''[[ad hominem]]'' attacks -- ''arguments to the man'' -- attacking the person you're debating with.  It is one sure sign you are losing the debate, your position has been weakened, or fails.

A project like this prospers on people working together toward improving articles. Anything else, especially attacks directed specifically at users, detracts from the wonderful thing that we are creating here. Do not try to advance or defend your argument, idea, or position by posting ''[[ad hominem]]'' attacks -- ''arguments to the man'' -- attacking the person you're debating with.  It is one sure sign you are losing the debate, your position has been weakened, or fails.

Some people feel they must retaliate against - or at least '''suppress''' annoying personal remarks directed against them. But the great writers of bygone years recommend against this (and recall that we all remember the great writers far better than their critics):

Some people feel they must retaliate against - or at least '''suppress''' annoying personal remarks directed against them. But the great writers of bygone years recommend against this (and recall that we all remember the great writers far better than their critics):