Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 78:
Line 78: − − == In other news... == − − Anyone who can read this article in one sitting deserves a medal. It's a masterclass in ponderous verbiage. − − ===Bloated and listless=== − <blockquote> − The theory of evolution is a naturalistic theory of the history of life on earth (this refers to the theory of evolution which employs methodological naturalism and is taught in schools and universities). Merriam-Webster's dictionary gives the following definition of evolution: "a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations..." Currently, there are several theories of evolution.<br><br> − − Since World War II a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs methodological naturalism have been atheists. In 2007, "Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture...announced that over 700 scientists from around the world have now signed a statement expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of Darwinian evolution." − </blockquote> − − ===It's a miracle! The words just fall off!=== − <blockquote> − The theory of evolution is a naturalistic theory of the history of life on Earth. It employs methodological naturalism and is widely taught in schools and universities. Merriam-Webster's dictionary defines evolution as "a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations."<br><br> − − Since World War II, the most vocal defenders of this theory have been atheists. In 2007, the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture announced that over 700 scientists had "signed a statement expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of Darwinian evolution." − </blockquote> − − It's not particularly scientific, but if we take the first two paragraphs as representative, then this article's at least 20% useless flab. Time to put your baby on a diet, Ken. − − --[[User:RichLiebehollenfeuer|RichLiebehollenfeuer]] 21:42, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
Reverted edits by RichLiebehollenfeuer (talk) to last revision by RonLar
::::And ''in this regard'' you obviously can't stand your ground.
::::And ''in this regard'' you obviously can't stand your ground.
::::[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 19:43, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
::::[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 19:43, 5 August 2011 (EDT)