Changes

Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)

Revision as of 02:15, August 15, 2011

793 bytes added , 02:15, August 15, 2011

→‎Attempt at Helping the Consnesus Along: Anyone who hopes to win a Nobel Prize, for example, would be foolish to criticize Relativity because that would prevent him from ever winning the prize

Line 578: Line 578:

[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 21:36, 14 August 2011 (EDT)

+

: Sam, logic and science are not determined by "consensus". Of course, for a variety of reasons, many people dare not question liberal theories. Anyone who hopes to win a Nobel Prize, for example, would be foolish to criticize [[Relativity]] because that would prevent him from ever winning the prize. But here we're more concerned about the truth than what others may think.

+

: I reviewed your points 1-5 and was not persuaded by any of them. For example, gravity waves do not exist. Liberals should stop wasting the public's money looking for them. There's no point in proceeding to your criticism of other points, because just one counterexample is enough to disprove Relativity. Hopefully you'll at least concede that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:15, 14 August 2011 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,363

edits