79
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 619:
Line 619: + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 19:43, August 16, 2011
, 19:43, August 16, 2011→Attempt at Helping the Consensus Along
:::::::: Liberals already teach that Newtonian mechanics is fundamentally incorrect, so there is little reason to add to that (often false) criticism. In contrast, liberals insist that Relativity must be true and they punish anyone who dares claim otherwise. That needs to be challenged, but don't expect anyone who is a university grad student or professor wannabee to dare to do so. His career will be over if he utters any criticism of Relativity.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:20, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
:::::::: Liberals already teach that Newtonian mechanics is fundamentally incorrect, so there is little reason to add to that (often false) criticism. In contrast, liberals insist that Relativity must be true and they punish anyone who dares claim otherwise. That needs to be challenged, but don't expect anyone who is a university grad student or professor wannabee to dare to do so. His career will be over if he utters any criticism of Relativity.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:20, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
::::::::: Where have you read this that this is not true about Newtonian Mechanics? Academic sources, please.
::::::::: With "liberals" are you referring also to non-physicists? Because, as you can easily imagine, their opinions don't have much value... --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 15:43, 16 August 2011 (EDT)