Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hubble redshift"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Forgot to sign.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Why create this page? There's already an article on redshift, and the addition of this extremely brief article seems to achieve nothing. I vote this for speedy deletion unless someone can prove that "Hubble redshift" is somehow different from the normal redshift that Hubble discovered. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 19:09, 23 August 2011 (EDT)
 
Why create this page? There's already an article on redshift, and the addition of this extremely brief article seems to achieve nothing. I vote this for speedy deletion unless someone can prove that "Hubble redshift" is somehow different from the normal redshift that Hubble discovered. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 19:09, 23 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
:Agreed, the relevant parts should be moved to [[redshift]] then the rest deleted. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:10, 23 August 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:10, August 23, 2011

Why create this page? There's already an article on redshift, and the addition of this extremely brief article seems to achieve nothing. I vote this for speedy deletion unless someone can prove that "Hubble redshift" is somehow different from the normal redshift that Hubble discovered. --JMairs 19:09, 23 August 2011 (EDT)

Agreed, the relevant parts should be moved to redshift then the rest deleted. MaxFletcher 19:10, 23 August 2011 (EDT)