Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hubble redshift"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Deletion: new section)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Why create this page? There's already an article on redshift, and the addition of this extremely brief article seems to achieve nothing. I vote this for speedy deletion unless someone can prove that "Hubble redshift" is somehow different from the normal redshift that Hubble discovered. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 19:09, 23 August 2011 (EDT)
 
Why create this page? There's already an article on redshift, and the addition of this extremely brief article seems to achieve nothing. I vote this for speedy deletion unless someone can prove that "Hubble redshift" is somehow different from the normal redshift that Hubble discovered. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 19:09, 23 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:Agreed, the relevant parts should be moved to [[redshift]] then the rest deleted. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:10, 23 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:Agreed, the relevant parts should be moved to [[redshift]] then the rest deleted. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:10, 23 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Deletion ==
 +
 +
I have moved the relevant parts over to [[redshift]]. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:18, 23 August 2011 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 23:18, August 23, 2011

Why create this page? There's already an article on redshift, and the addition of this extremely brief article seems to achieve nothing. I vote this for speedy deletion unless someone can prove that "Hubble redshift" is somehow different from the normal redshift that Hubble discovered. --JMairs 19:09, 23 August 2011 (EDT)

Agreed, the relevant parts should be moved to redshift then the rest deleted. MaxFletcher 19:10, 23 August 2011 (EDT)

Deletion

I have moved the relevant parts over to redshift. MaxFletcher 19:18, 23 August 2011 (EDT)