138
edits
Changes
Crackpot Index applied to Jast
:::Feynman was an atheist, an evolutionist and very much what you call a "relativist." --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 15:37, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
:::Feynman was an atheist, an evolutionist and very much what you call a "relativist." --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 15:37, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
:::: [http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html Crackpot index] by John Baez:
:::
:::: 1 point for every statement that is widely agreed on to be false.
:::: - "that the universe is not expanding"
:::: 2 points for every statement that is clearly vacuous.
:::: - "It suggests the existence of overlooked by cosmologists the antisymmetric part of Ricci tensor in time domain,"
:::: 5 points for each such statement that is adhered to despite careful correction.
::::
:::: 5 points for each mention of "Einstien", "Hawkins" or "Feynmann".
:::: -Einstein and Feynman get mentioned a lot, especially Einstein.
:::: 10 points for pointing out that you have gone to school, as if this were evidence of sanity.
:::: -"electronic engineering in which I have MS degree from Warsaw Politechnic"
:::: 10 points for beginning the description of your theory by saying how long you have been working on it. (10 more for emphasizing that you worked on your own.)
:::: - "I'm a sculptor who by a strange twist of fate consisting of proving mathematically in February 1985 that the universe is not expanding"
:::: 10 points for each new term you invent and use without properly defining it.
:::: "Hubble tensor" or taking it as the 'anti-symmetric part of the Ricci tensor' than that's just zero and that's still a fail.
:::: 10 points for each statement along the lines of "I'm not good at math, but my theory is conceptually right, so all I need is for someone to express it in terms of equations".
:::: - "Einstein was not able to manage "his blunder", while I could, and in rather straight forward manner, practically not knowing any tensor calculus being a sculptor rather than a cosmologist"
:::: 10 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Einstein, or claim that special or general relativity are fundamentally misguided (without good evidence).
:::: See above quote. Even worse than "favorable comparison".
:::: 30 points for suggesting that Einstein, in his later years, was groping his way towards the ideas you now advocate.
:::: Yep.
:::: 40 points for claiming that the "scientific establishment" is engaged in a "conspiracy" to prevent your work from gaining its well-deserved fame, or suchlike.
:::: http://conservapedia.com/Relativists
:::: 50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions.
:::: --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 16:16, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
First, I note that some of your citations lead to broken internet links.
First, I note that some of your citations lead to broken internet links.