Changes

Why Newtonian calculations in flat space produce as a result [[Einstein's radius]] of curvature of space? Isn't something to wonder about? Not to mention the observed result of cosmological redshift. And observed accelerating expansion of the universe.

Why Newtonian calculations in flat space produce as a result [[Einstein's radius]] of curvature of space? Isn't something to wonder about? Not to mention the observed result of cosmological redshift. And observed accelerating expansion of the universe.

And what is ''gravitational energy'' that one simply differentiate to get "gravitational force" that we know from Einsteins that it is not there at all? Here we came to the real question. The answer is interesting though very, very, simple: It is energy content of matter in <math>E=mc^2</math>. What?! Says every physicists I told this story to. It it were so simple we would learn it already in a high school.  

 

And what is ''gravitational energy'' that one simply differentiate to get "gravitational force" that we know from Einsteins is not there at all? Here we came to the real question. The answer is interesting though very, very, simple: It is energy content of matter in <math>E=mc^2</math>. What?! Says every physicists I told this story to. It it were so simple we would learn it already in a high school.  

Jim is a "crank" though with zero credibility among scientist and so despit he discovered those things already in 1985 they were not published before this essay (OK, they were published in RW, but supressed by university of Warsaw since I was not their student enymore and so his paper explaining gravitation and cosmological redshif and such, shouldn't be linked to from their server. So I just typed it in manually into CP server and let see how long it survives here. For the time being you, the readers of CP, may find it in a form of my paper [[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]] or in simpler version that a high school student may reapeat herself [[Essay:Demystified gravitation]] in a form of 11 step derivation of ''cosmological redshift'' for our universe, that the Big Bang aficionados neglected to calculate before jumping to conclusion that the universe is ''surely'' expanding. And this way converting the majority of non believers into believers in ''creation'' of the whole universe out of nothing as it was planned by John Archibald Wheeler, who belived in it too.  

Jim is a "crank" though with zero credibility among scientist and so despit he discovered those things already in 1985 they were not published before this essay (OK, they were published in RW, but supressed by university of Warsaw since I was not their student enymore and so his paper explaining gravitation and cosmological redshif and such, shouldn't be linked to from their server. So I just typed it in manually into CP server and let see how long it survives here. For the time being you, the readers of CP, may find it in a form of my paper [[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]] or in simpler version that a high school student may reapeat herself [[Essay:Demystified gravitation]] in a form of 11 step derivation of ''cosmological redshift'' for our universe, that the Big Bang aficionados neglected to calculate before jumping to conclusion that the universe is ''surely'' expanding. And this way converting the majority of non believers into believers in ''creation'' of the whole universe out of nothing as it was planned by John Archibald Wheeler, who belived in it too.