Difference between revisions of "Citizenship Cases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rsmitchell (talk | contribs) (typos) |
m (Reverted edits by Rsmitchell (talk) to last revision by FernoKlump) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''Citizenship Cases''' are the key cases concerning the power of Congress to authorization revocation of citizenship under certain conditions, such as commission of a crime: | |
| − | + | ||
| + | *''[[Trop v. Dulles]]'' (1958) (4-1-4), with Justice [[William Brennan]] providing the key concurrence with the [[liberal]] majority. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *''[[Perez v. Brownell]]'' (1958) (5-4) when Justice [[William Brennan]] joined the [[conservative]] majority, decided the same day as ''Trop''. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *''[[Afroyim v. Rusk]]'' (1967), overruling ''Brownell''. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Chief Justice Warren and Justices Black, Douglas, Fortas, Marshall voted to declare these laws unconstitutional, and were eventually joined by Justice Brennan. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Justices Frankfurter, Harlan, Clark, Stewart, White voted to uphold these laws. | ||
| + | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Revision as of 00:33, August 31, 2011
Citizenship Cases are the key cases concerning the power of Congress to authorization revocation of citizenship under certain conditions, such as commission of a crime:
- Trop v. Dulles (1958) (4-1-4), with Justice William Brennan providing the key concurrence with the liberal majority.
- Perez v. Brownell (1958) (5-4) when Justice William Brennan joined the conservative majority, decided the same day as Trop.
- Afroyim v. Rusk (1967), overruling Brownell.
Chief Justice Warren and Justices Black, Douglas, Fortas, Marshall voted to declare these laws unconstitutional, and were eventually joined by Justice Brennan.
Justices Frankfurter, Harlan, Clark, Stewart, White voted to uphold these laws.