Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427
edits
Changes
→Support
Recently, there have been articles which were favorable to the intelligent design position in scientific journals which traditionally have favored the macroevolutionary position. <ref>http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2640</ref>
Recently, there have been articles which were favorable to the intelligent design position in scientific journals which traditionally have favored the macroevolutionary position. <ref>http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2640</ref>
Design theory enjoys a small amount of stated support within the worldwide scientific community (creationist scientists report there is widespread discriminatory action against creationist scientists <ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v9/i2/suppression.asp </ref>). From 2001 to 2007, over 700 scientists had signed the pro-Intelligent Design manifesto, ''A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism'', published by the leaders of the design movement, the Discovery Institute. <ref>http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/</ref> This has caused some scientists to question the claim of the dominant scientific community that evolution is the best explanation for the origin of life and call for public school science students to study the evidence supporting it in greater detail.
Design theory enjoys a small amount of stated support within the worldwide scientific community (creationist scientists report there is widespread discriminatory action against creationist scientists <ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v9/i2/suppression.asp </ref>). From 2001 to 2007, over 700 scientists had signed the pro-Intelligent Design manifesto, ''A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism'', published by the leaders of the design movement, the [[Discovery Institute]]. <ref>http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/</ref> This has caused some scientists to question the claim of the dominant scientific community that evolution is the best explanation for the origin of life and call for public school science students to study the evidence supporting it in greater detail.
== Opposition ==
== Opposition ==