Changes

302 bytes added ,  19:26, September 5, 2011
it is essential that historians take their critical role seriously and always place it before their political inclinations
Line 1: Line 1:  
'''Integrity''' is the [[property]] of being [[faith|faithful]] to what you believe in or the values you are sworn to uphold. Integrity as a character or personality trait is defined as someone that is [[honest]] and [[truth|truthful]] in what they say or do. A person with integrity is typically one with honesty, sense of duty, and sound moral principles above all else.<ref>[http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/usmc/leadership_traits.htm Marine Corps Leadership Traits], ''Center for Strategic Leadership Studies'', (2010).</ref>
 
'''Integrity''' is the [[property]] of being [[faith|faithful]] to what you believe in or the values you are sworn to uphold. Integrity as a character or personality trait is defined as someone that is [[honest]] and [[truth|truthful]] in what they say or do. A person with integrity is typically one with honesty, sense of duty, and sound moral principles above all else.<ref>[http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/usmc/leadership_traits.htm Marine Corps Leadership Traits], ''Center for Strategic Leadership Studies'', (2010).</ref>
 +
 +
* The [[Michael Bellesiles|Bellesiles]] case underlines how essential it is that historians take their critical role seriously and always place it before their political inclinations. Our professional integrity demands it. [http://reason.com/archives/2003/03/01/disarming-history/3 Disarming History]
     
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits