Changes

→‎Objectivity: the revised question does not differentiate between those who are closedminded in their belief in evolution, and those who are openminded.
Line 297: Line 297:     
:: Even if there is strong evidence to support [[Creation]], you can never be 100% sure and I believe it is a sign of open-mindedness to acknowledge the fact that there may be another answer, unlikely as this may be. --[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 17:17, 5 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:: Even if there is strong evidence to support [[Creation]], you can never be 100% sure and I believe it is a sign of open-mindedness to acknowledge the fact that there may be another answer, unlikely as this may be. --[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 17:17, 5 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::I see your point, but the revised question does not differentiate between those who are closedminded in their belief in evolution, and those who are openminded.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:27, 5 September 2011 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,305

edits