95
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + + + +
User talk:KevinDavis (view source)
Revision as of 14:19, September 9, 2011
, 14:19, September 9, 2011→Style: new section
Yes, that is correct.--[[User:GOPFan2011|GOPFan2011]] 13:40, 5 September 2011 (EDT)
Yes, that is correct.--[[User:GOPFan2011|GOPFan2011]] 13:40, 5 September 2011 (EDT)
== Style ==
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Samuel_Johnson&action=historysubmit&diff=912711&oldid=912612 Regarding this]: there are two ways to approach quotes and punctuation. One format (which I prefer) is to only have the quotes represent the quote punctuation, i.e. if there is a comma or period at the end of the quote then put that punctuation, if not leave punctuation outside of the quote. Some others prefer to have all punctuation within a quote. One is based on quotation correctness logic, the other is based on uniformity. Which does Conservapedia prefer so that can be established (or you'll have to be doing a lot of changes to switch it over :) )? I do have a program that can swap the punctuation more easily so I can handle some of it without a problem. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 10:19, 9 September 2011 (EDT)