SkipCaptcha
708
edits
Changes
User talk:JimJast (view source)
Revision as of 19:02, September 14, 2011
, 19:02, September 14, 2011→Problems
::::::::::Feynman believed no such thing; he fully accepted LOTS of scientific theories that aren't quantum, mainly because to do otherwise would be utterly insane. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 20:06, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
::::::::::Feynman believed no such thing; he fully accepted LOTS of scientific theories that aren't quantum, mainly because to do otherwise would be utterly insane. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 20:06, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
:::::::::::When I find Feynman's text where he insists on true theories being necessarily quantum theories I'll send you the quatation with a source. I don't remember where I have read it.
:::::::::::There is also the matter of interpretation of "true" and "scientific" (theory). E.g. Newtonian gravitation was for a long time a "true" and scientific theory and people accepted "gravitational attraction" since there was nothing better. Newton didn't accept it since he didn't believe that action at a distance is possible. When Einstein showed that Newton theory is not a true theory it stopped being true though whether it is still "scientific" becomes a matter of opinion. I classify theories that are not true as "pseudo scientific" but it might be considered to be "scientific" for historical reasons. Feynman treated Einstein's theory the same way: as "true" until its quantum version will be found and replace the "linear" Einstein's version Feynman thought.
:::::::::::BTW how do you like attempt on Einsteinian gravitation (EGR)? If you respond please do it in talk page of my essay:Demystified gravitation. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 15:02, 14 September 2011 (EDT)
First, I note that some of your citations lead to broken internet links.
First, I note that some of your citations lead to broken internet links.