Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bestiality"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(I agree with the rv)
(US law: new section)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
Please read articles before using them as sources. Often, buried in the details, you'll find a fact that disproves the point you were hoping to make with the source. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:43, 24 September 2011 (EDT)
 
Please read articles before using them as sources. Often, buried in the details, you'll find a fact that disproves the point you were hoping to make with the source. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:43, 24 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== US law ==
 +
 +
Hey, I love your articles! Its great to see that idiot Myers on the spot as the true consequences of his religion are pointed out. Just one thing though. If I was you I'd take out the bit about US state law on bestiality. The reason is that its legal in 5 of the top 10 most Christian states but only in 4 of the 10 least Christian. I know that dont really mean anything but atheists could twist it and use it to attack you. Keep up the Lord's work! --[[User:LeonardS|LeonardS]] 18:44, 26 September 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 22:44, September 26, 2011

No need to be lurid; the quote already provides as much of a definition as we need "molesting animals". --Ed Poor Talk 10:24, 20 January 2010 (EST)

Demography of this perversion

The deleted reference mentioned that this perversion is "extremely rare". It also briefly mentioned a write-in campaign promoting the idea that "highly educated professionals" engaged in the practice. But:

  • Unfortunately, although intriguing, it was impossible to establish the veracity of most letters.

Please read articles before using them as sources. Often, buried in the details, you'll find a fact that disproves the point you were hoping to make with the source. --Ed Poor Talk 15:43, 24 September 2011 (EDT)

US law

Hey, I love your articles! Its great to see that idiot Myers on the spot as the true consequences of his religion are pointed out. Just one thing though. If I was you I'd take out the bit about US state law on bestiality. The reason is that its legal in 5 of the top 10 most Christian states but only in 4 of the 10 least Christian. I know that dont really mean anything but atheists could twist it and use it to attack you. Keep up the Lord's work! --LeonardS 18:44, 26 September 2011 (EDT)