Difference between revisions of "Beg the question"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Undo revision 908733 by AznBurger (talk))
m (propose merge)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{merge with|Circular reasoning}}
 
"Begging the question" is a form of logical fallacy in which a claim is automatically assumed to be true without evidence other than the statement or claim itself. It is also known as a form of [[circular reasoning]].
 
"Begging the question" is a form of logical fallacy in which a claim is automatically assumed to be true without evidence other than the statement or claim itself. It is also known as a form of [[circular reasoning]].
  

Revision as of 16:47, October 10, 2011

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with [[::Circular reasoning|Circular reasoning]]. (Discuss)

"Begging the question" is a form of logical fallacy in which a claim is automatically assumed to be true without evidence other than the statement or claim itself. It is also known as a form of circular reasoning.

The phrase is commonly confused with "raising the question," an error that has gained traction through incorrect popular usage.[1]

Examples

  • "If such actions were not illegal, then they would not be prohibited by the law."
  • Person 1:"He is very ugly."
Person 2: Why do you say that?"
Person 1: "Because he is so unattractive."

References