Difference between revisions of "Talk:Question evolution! campaign"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This article seems like it is trying to endorse Youtube user ShockofGod more than explain anything or offer any useful information. USer:Gelatin | This article seems like it is trying to endorse Youtube user ShockofGod more than explain anything or offer any useful information. USer:Gelatin | ||
:You are not being very specific when it comes to supporting your contention. It seems like you are just spoiling for a pointless internet argument. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:00, 13 October 2011 (EDT) | :You are not being very specific when it comes to supporting your contention. It seems like you are just spoiling for a pointless internet argument. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:00, 13 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :: Well in six of the sections on the article it makes a direct reference to the youtube user ShockofGod which makes it seem like more of an endorsement to him than to the actual campaign, in addition it puts too much priority on him as opposed to other evangelicals with the same message. | ||
Revision as of 15:48, October 14, 2011
This article seems like it is trying to endorse Youtube user ShockofGod more than explain anything or offer any useful information. USer:Gelatin
- You are not being very specific when it comes to supporting your contention. It seems like you are just spoiling for a pointless internet argument. Conservative 22:00, 13 October 2011 (EDT)
- Well in six of the sections on the article it makes a direct reference to the youtube user ShockofGod which makes it seem like more of an endorsement to him than to the actual campaign, in addition it puts too much priority on him as opposed to other evangelicals with the same message.