Changes

:I'd like to address any specific points.  I have an open mind about this.  In response to your points above, liberal deception is not always obvious.  Jerome and others (and the KJV) did not have all the evidence and political experience that we have today.  Jerome was an expert scholar, rather than an expert at recognizing deception.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:58, 25 October 2011 (EDT)

:I'd like to address any specific points.  I have an open mind about this.  In response to your points above, liberal deception is not always obvious.  Jerome and others (and the KJV) did not have all the evidence and political experience that we have today.  Jerome was an expert scholar, rather than an expert at recognizing deception.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:58, 25 October 2011 (EDT)

::Andy, I have endeavored to keep this discussion civil. I have also gone the extra mile and pointed out your accomplishments (having the great idea of a conservative wiki, writing some good articles and essays at this wiki, having some good ideas as far as how this wiki is operated). I also said that I read a few of your World History lectures and found some interesting information and liked them.  However, you are not convincing me that you have a strong propensity to be open to admitting error.  For example, why do you still have this sentence in your first World History lecture?: "Every source is available to us, including the Bible. Everything mankind has ever written, invented, observed, conquered and destroyed is part of "World history.""[http://conservapedia.com/World_History_Lecture_One]  I clearly showed you that our knowledge of history is partial and that all sources are not available to us. For example I cited this: "The Book of Jashar is one of the lost source books of early Israelite poetry from the Amarna Age (15th and 14th centuries B.C"[http://record.americanbible.org/content/bible-qa/book-jashar-missing-book]  Yet, this sentence in your World History lecture stubbornly remains. Therefore, I am concluding that you do have some resistance to admitting error. I am not saying you do not have some openness to hearing others, but I do see evidence that you dislike admitting error. A good start in changing this trait would be to fix this error in your World History lecture. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:25, 25 October 2011 (EDT)

::Andy, I have endeavored to keep this discussion civil. I have also gone the extra mile and pointed out your accomplishments at this wiki (having the great idea of a conservative wiki, writing some good articles and essays at this wiki, having some good ideas as far as how this wiki is operated). I also said that I read a few of your World History lectures and found some interesting information and liked them.  However, you are not convincing me that you have a strong propensity to be open to admitting error.  For example, why do you still have this sentence in your first World History lecture?: "Every source is available to us, including the Bible. Everything mankind has ever written, invented, observed, conquered and destroyed is part of "World history.""[http://conservapedia.com/World_History_Lecture_One]  I clearly showed you that our knowledge of history is partial and that all sources are not available to us. For example I cited this: "The Book of Jashar is one of the lost source books of early Israelite poetry from the Amarna Age (15th and 14th centuries B.C"[http://record.americanbible.org/content/bible-qa/book-jashar-missing-book]  Yet, this sentence in your World History lecture stubbornly remains. Therefore, I am concluding that you do have some resistance to admitting error. I am not saying you do not have some openness to hearing others, but I do see evidence that you dislike admitting error. A good start in changing this trait would be to fix this error in your World History lecture. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:25, 25 October 2011 (EDT)

==Example of what liberalism has done==

==Example of what liberalism has done==