1,660
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: + + +
Talk:Definition of evolution (view source)
Revision as of 16:05, April 8, 2007
, 16:05, April 8, 2007→eh what?
:::That is only relevant if you are using that as part of your classification system. They've also found that humans have about 50% of their DNA in common with bananas, so does that make us 50% plants? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:28, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
:::That is only relevant if you are using that as part of your classification system. They've also found that humans have about 50% of their DNA in common with bananas, so does that make us 50% plants? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:28, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
::::No, but it indicates that humans and plants forked from each other a lot earlier than humans and chimps did. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 11:48, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
::::No, but it indicates that humans and plants forked from each other a lot earlier than humans and chimps did. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 11:48, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
:Phil, that question reveals a level of ignorance so profound that I'm not sure where to start. The kingdoms of Animalia an Plantae branched off very far in the past, far enough that, while we share enough DNA to show that we both originated from common ancestors on Earth, evolution as separated us enough that we not only are separate species, but actually in separated kingdoms.[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 12:05, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
== That particular definition ==
== That particular definition ==