686
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 50:
Line 50: + +
Talk:Definition of evolution (view source)
Revision as of 16:59, April 8, 2007
, 16:59, April 8, 2007→That particular definition
Since the soul is immaterial, it is not a part of a scientific classification system. You cant measure it, you can perhaps say humans have one, but then what? Measure a chimps soul?[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 12:35, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
Since the soul is immaterial, it is not a part of a scientific classification system. You cant measure it, you can perhaps say humans have one, but then what? Measure a chimps soul?[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 12:35, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
:Do all possible classification systems have to be scientific ones? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:39, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
:Do all possible classification systems have to be scientific ones? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:39, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
Consider that classification systems rely on logic to be affective, so the answer is yes all classification systems have to be scientific.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 12:59, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
== Gradual appearance of new forms of life ==
== Gradual appearance of new forms of life ==