Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jerry Falwell"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rob Pommer (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Also I'm not sure that rotten.com is a "reliable" source.[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 22:18, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | :Also I'm not sure that rotten.com is a "reliable" source.[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 22:18, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : My addition to this article is based on fact, not opinion. Critics do indeed attack Falwell's connection the Unification Church. This is not an attack or "smear" on Christians in general but a verifiable fact about the controversy surrounding a public figure. Opposing viewpoints supported by citations are welcome, but this is tantamount to censorhip. Rotten has an admitted liberal bias but all their info in this instance is credible and independently verifiable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Hektor|Hektor]] 22:22, 8 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:22, April 9, 2007
This page needs improvement to do justice to Rev. Falwell.
I rolled back the liberal gossip about Falwell and Rev. Moon. It's nothing more than a smear effort of the sort we don't allow under our rules. Falwell is not an adherent of Rev. Moon's church and Falwell is entitled to do business just like everyone else. The smear was unsupported by a credible resource.
Be fair to Christians and everyone else here.--Aschlafly 22:16, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
- My addition to this article is based on fact, not opinion. Critics do indeed attack Falwell's connection the Unification Church. This is not an attack or "smear" on Christians in general but a verifiable fact about the controversy surrounding a public figure. Opposing viewpoints supported by citations are welcome, but this is tantamount to censorhip. Rotten has an admitted liberal bias but all their info in this instance is credible and independently verifiable.
--Hektor 22:22, 8 April 2007 (EDT)