Difference between revisions of "User talk:Factcheck47"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Undo revision 946553 by CliveRR (talk) revert gubbins)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
Whoops, my bad, will do in the future.[[User:Factcheck47|Factcheck47: Making sure Conservapedia stays Trustworthy]] 15:16, 18 December 2011 (EST)
 
Whoops, my bad, will do in the future.[[User:Factcheck47|Factcheck47: Making sure Conservapedia stays Trustworthy]] 15:16, 18 December 2011 (EST)
 +
 +
==Your time here has been fun but...==
 +
We don't need your help, just thought you should know. Plus, forget about fact tags. Do a search and if you don't find any source, then remove. if not, you are to be removed for wasting our time.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:46, 19 December 2011 (EST)

Revision as of 18:46, December 19, 2011

Welcome!

Hello, Factcheck47, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Factcheck47!


Please sign your comments using ~~~~.--James Wilson 14:55, 18 December 2011 (EST)


Whoops, my bad, will do in the future.Factcheck47: Making sure Conservapedia stays Trustworthy 15:16, 18 December 2011 (EST)

Your time here has been fun but...

We don't need your help, just thought you should know. Plus, forget about fact tags. Do a search and if you don't find any source, then remove. if not, you are to be removed for wasting our time.--Jpatt 13:46, 19 December 2011 (EST)