Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
484 bytes added ,  11:49, April 9, 2007
a time when Wikipedia was a meritocracy
Line 3: Line 3:  
</small>
 
</small>
   −
"It was, by his own admission, a "messy" way to make decisions. But it had one overwhelming advantage; allowing people to operate without having to explain themselves constantly turns out to be like the rule of agreement in [[improv]]. It enables rapid cognition." ([[Paul van Riper]]'s big victory in ''Blink'')
+
*It was, by his own admission, a "messy" way to make decisions. But it had one overwhelming advantage; allowing people to operate without having to explain themselves constantly turns out to be like the rule of agreement in [[improv]]. It enables rapid cognition." ([[Paul van Riper]]'s big victory in ''Blink'')
 +
 
 +
There was a time when Wikipedia was a [[meritocracy]], and I rose rapidly through the ranks then. I got Jimbo to create the Mediation and Arbitration committee's, so he wouldn't have to be the sheriff all the time. I became the first elected bureaucrat, and pioneered the system whereby admins could enforce rules without having to take everything before a committee.
 +
 
 +
But I didn't see the anti-elitism creeping up and choking the life out of the place. [[Larry Sanger]] was right.
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu