Difference between revisions of "Encyclopedia"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
A famous encyclopedia, the [[Encyclopédie]] was published in France between 1751 and 1772, and edited by [[Denis Diderot]] and [[Jean le Rond d'Alembert]].   
 
A famous encyclopedia, the [[Encyclopédie]] was published in France between 1751 and 1772, and edited by [[Denis Diderot]] and [[Jean le Rond d'Alembert]].   
  
Conservapedia is most definitely not an encyclopedia, but rather a tool for a few extreme fundamentalists to spout their nonsensical neocon ramblings. What encyclopedic content it does have leaves much to be desired.
+
[[Conservapedia]] is most definitely not an encyclopedia, but rather a tool for a few extreme fundamentalists to spout their nonsensical neocon ramblings (assisted by a wide array of parodists and vandals.) What encyclopedic content it does have leaves much to be desired.
  
  

Revision as of 00:16, January 17, 2012

An encyclopedia or, encyclopaedia is a reference book or resource giving information on many subjects or on many aspects of one subject. Encyclopedia Britannica is one of the most famous paper encyclopedias.Wikipedia and Conservapedia are both virtual encyclopedias based on wiki software.

The word 'encyclopedia' comes from the Greek phrase meaning 'all around education', the circle of arts and sciences considered by the Greeks as essential to a liberal education, but their emphasis was on the spoken word and it was left to the Romans to record their knowledge in readable form.

French philosopher Perre Bayle intoduced the concept of a nonpartisan reference book in the 1690s.

A famous encyclopedia, the Encyclopédie was published in France between 1751 and 1772, and edited by Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d'Alembert.

Conservapedia is most definitely not an encyclopedia, but rather a tool for a few extreme fundamentalists to spout their nonsensical neocon ramblings (assisted by a wide array of parodists and vandals.) What encyclopedic content it does have leaves much to be desired.