Difference between revisions of "User talk:CPanel"
Conservative (talk | contribs) (Regarding a concise defintion of the theory of evolution) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Your very welcome! Your work to help with this project has been amazing. We greatly appreciate all your contributions. ~ [[User:CPanel|CPanel]] 18:23, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | ::Your very welcome! Your work to help with this project has been amazing. We greatly appreciate all your contributions. ~ [[User:CPanel|CPanel]] 18:23, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Regarding a concise defintion of the theory of evolution == | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Regarding a concise definition == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am glad to hear that the panel came to a decision on this matter. I have a question though and '''it is probably based on the panel seeing a prior version of the article and not the current article. ''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Here is what a panel spokesperson wrote:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | "We have decided that the article will not be changed in any major way. However, we agree that the article lacks an adequate, concise explanation of the Theory of Evolution." [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Theory_of_evolution] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Here is what the article states now:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Today advocates of evolution no longer adhere to "natural selection" as the definition of evolution, but rather define it simply as any "change over time" in the genetic composition of a population.... | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Merriam-Webster's dictionary defines evolution as a "theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations." <ref>http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/evolution</ref>..... | ||
| + | |||
| + | Evolutionist [[Theodosius Dobzhansky]] wrote: "The process of [[mutation]] is the only known source of the new materials of genetic variability, and hence of evolution." <ref>http://www.nwcreation.net/geneticquotes.html</ref> Evolutionists believe that the processes of natural selection and mutation created every species of life that we see on earth today after [[Origin of life|life first came about on earth]]. <ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v12/i1/improbable.asp</ref> Creationist scientists believe that mutations and natural selection would not cause [[macroevolution]]. <ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/mutations.asp</ref><ref>http://www.trueorigin.org/mutations01.asp</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v12/i1/improbable.asp</ref><ref>http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3831</ref><ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/selection.asp</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''MY SUMMATION STATEMENT TO THE PANEL:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think the above current version gives a concise and adequate explanation of the theory of evolution and Aschlafly concurrs. I am hoping that the panel agrees and that they based their statement above based on a prior version they read. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:32, 9 April 2007 (EDT)conservative | ||
Revision as of 22:37, April 9, 2007
This is the username for the Conservapedia Student Panel. Please Submit any problems and requests you have here.
- Thank you for creating the student panel and letting us newcomers join your homeschool project. It's an honor to be here, and if there's anything I can do to help, don't hesitate to ask. --Ed Poor 18:20, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
- Your very welcome! Your work to help with this project has been amazing. We greatly appreciate all your contributions. ~ CPanel 18:23, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
Regarding a concise defintion of the theory of evolution
Regarding a concise definition
I am glad to hear that the panel came to a decision on this matter. I have a question though and it is probably based on the panel seeing a prior version of the article and not the current article.
Here is what a panel spokesperson wrote:
"We have decided that the article will not be changed in any major way. However, we agree that the article lacks an adequate, concise explanation of the Theory of Evolution." [1]
Here is what the article states now:
Today advocates of evolution no longer adhere to "natural selection" as the definition of evolution, but rather define it simply as any "change over time" in the genetic composition of a population....
Merriam-Webster's dictionary defines evolution as a "theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations." [1].....
Evolutionist Theodosius Dobzhansky wrote: "The process of mutation is the only known source of the new materials of genetic variability, and hence of evolution." [2] Evolutionists believe that the processes of natural selection and mutation created every species of life that we see on earth today after life first came about on earth. [3] Creationist scientists believe that mutations and natural selection would not cause macroevolution. [4][5][6][7][8]
MY SUMMATION STATEMENT TO THE PANEL:
I think the above current version gives a concise and adequate explanation of the theory of evolution and Aschlafly concurrs. I am hoping that the panel agrees and that they based their statement above based on a prior version they read.
Conservative 18:32, 9 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
- ↑ http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/evolution
- ↑ http://www.nwcreation.net/geneticquotes.html
- ↑ http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v12/i1/improbable.asp
- ↑ http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/mutations.asp
- ↑ http://www.trueorigin.org/mutations01.asp
- ↑ http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v12/i1/improbable.asp
- ↑ http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3831
- ↑ http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/selection.asp