Difference between revisions of "User talk:Baobab"
From Conservapedia
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Hi James Wilson. If Conservapedia really aspires to be a trustworthy encyclopedia, then all manifestly biased content has to be removed, not only by me, but also by you. And it shouldn't matter who added the content, whether an Administrator or a 'normal' contributor. So please stop undermining Conservapedia's credibility. Bear with me, I'm not calling you a vandal, but your actions and attitude do nothing to improve this highly interesting project. Regards, [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 14:29, 24 February 2012 (EST) | :Hi James Wilson. If Conservapedia really aspires to be a trustworthy encyclopedia, then all manifestly biased content has to be removed, not only by me, but also by you. And it shouldn't matter who added the content, whether an Administrator or a 'normal' contributor. So please stop undermining Conservapedia's credibility. Bear with me, I'm not calling you a vandal, but your actions and attitude do nothing to improve this highly interesting project. Regards, [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 14:29, 24 February 2012 (EST) | ||
::Hello, Baobab. However, I must warn you that it is generally against Conservapedia policy to revert additions made by Administrators; both of the edits you reverted were originally added by Administrators.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:33, 24 February 2012 (EST) | ::Hello, Baobab. However, I must warn you that it is generally against Conservapedia policy to revert additions made by Administrators; both of the edits you reverted were originally added by Administrators.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:33, 24 February 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | :::Okay, I didn't know Conservapedia is apparently some sort of caste system. But anyway, how do I know who is an Administrator and who is not and how do I know if a particular word or sentence was added by an Administrator? [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 14:55, 24 February 2012 (EST) | ||
==Article changes== | ==Article changes== | ||
If there are entries to articles that appear to be personal in nature rather than encyclopedic and neutral, feel free to change them. If you're unable to do it at the outset, i.e. admin page restrictions, make a proposed entry on the talk page and go from there. If an admin says no, accept it and move on to another topic. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:45, 24 February 2012 (EST) | If there are entries to articles that appear to be personal in nature rather than encyclopedic and neutral, feel free to change them. If you're unable to do it at the outset, i.e. admin page restrictions, make a proposed entry on the talk page and go from there. If an admin says no, accept it and move on to another topic. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:45, 24 February 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | :Hi Karajou, thanks for the suggestion. However, changing text that appeared to be personal in nature ("SNL became less funny in the past decade") rather than neutral was exactly what I did and what was reverted by James Wilson. [[User:Baobab|Baobab]] 14:55, 24 February 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:55, February 24, 2012
Please don't remove content, especially content added by Administrators.--James Wilson 14:17, 24 February 2012 (EST)
- Hi James Wilson. If Conservapedia really aspires to be a trustworthy encyclopedia, then all manifestly biased content has to be removed, not only by me, but also by you. And it shouldn't matter who added the content, whether an Administrator or a 'normal' contributor. So please stop undermining Conservapedia's credibility. Bear with me, I'm not calling you a vandal, but your actions and attitude do nothing to improve this highly interesting project. Regards, Baobab 14:29, 24 February 2012 (EST)
- Hello, Baobab. However, I must warn you that it is generally against Conservapedia policy to revert additions made by Administrators; both of the edits you reverted were originally added by Administrators.--James Wilson 14:33, 24 February 2012 (EST)
- Okay, I didn't know Conservapedia is apparently some sort of caste system. But anyway, how do I know who is an Administrator and who is not and how do I know if a particular word or sentence was added by an Administrator? Baobab 14:55, 24 February 2012 (EST)
- Hello, Baobab. However, I must warn you that it is generally against Conservapedia policy to revert additions made by Administrators; both of the edits you reverted were originally added by Administrators.--James Wilson 14:33, 24 February 2012 (EST)
Article changes
If there are entries to articles that appear to be personal in nature rather than encyclopedic and neutral, feel free to change them. If you're unable to do it at the outset, i.e. admin page restrictions, make a proposed entry on the talk page and go from there. If an admin says no, accept it and move on to another topic. Karajou 14:45, 24 February 2012 (EST)
- Hi Karajou, thanks for the suggestion. However, changing text that appeared to be personal in nature ("SNL became less funny in the past decade") rather than neutral was exactly what I did and what was reverted by James Wilson. Baobab 14:55, 24 February 2012 (EST)
