Changes

'''Singularity''' is an event that due to its nature is assumed to only happened once<ref name="LENNOX">{{cite book

In physical realms the '''singularity''' is an event that due to its nature is assumed to only happened once<ref name="LENNOX">{{cite book

|author=John C. Lennox

|author=John C. Lennox

|title=God's undertaker. Has science buried God?

|title=God's undertaker. Has science buried God?

|url=

|url=

|isbn=978-0-7459-5371-7

|isbn=978-0-7459-5371-7

|quote=Apart from the obvious fact that no one observed [the origin of the universe], scientists think of the Big Bang as a singularity in the past, an unrepeatable event;...}}</ref> and that has no ''natural'' explanation. Most frequently the term is used in connection with the [[origin science|origin]] of the [[universe]]. When scientific principles were first being developed into the [[scientific method]], scientists like [[Francis Bacon]], [[Johannes Kepler]], [[Isaac Newton]], and [[Lord Kelvin|William Kelvin]] distinguished between primary and secondary (''natural'') causes. A ''primary cause'' was meant to be a ''first cause'' to explain singularities.<ref name="skeptics">{{Cite book

|quote=Apart from the obvious fact that no one observed [the origin of the universe], scientists think of the Big Bang as a singularity in the past, an unrepeatable event;...}}</ref> and that has no ''natural'' explanation. Most frequently the term is used in connection with the [[origin science|origin]] of the [[universe]]. When scientific principles were first being developed into the [[scientific method]], scientists like [[Francis Bacon]], [[Johannes Kepler]], [[Isaac Newton]], and [[Lord Kelvin|William Kelvin]] distinguished between primary and [[Natural causes|secondary (''natural'') causes]]. A ''primary cause'' was meant to be a ''first cause'' to explain singularities.<ref name="skeptics">{{Cite book

   | author = Norman L. Geisler and Ronald M. Brooks

   | author = Norman L. Geisler and Ronald M. Brooks

   | year=1990

   | year=1990

|isbn=978-0-85234-707-2

|isbn=978-0-85234-707-2

|url=

|url=

|quote= }}</ref> as another parameter goes to zero. There is however a problem how to interpret such terms as an infinite temperature, infinite mass, infinite energy or infinite force in the realms of physics. That's why many [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalistic]] physicists assume that there is some new set of physical laws<ref name="Guth">{{cite web

|quote= }}</ref> as another parameter goes to zero. There is however a problem how to interpret such terms as an infinite temperature, infinite mass, infinite energy or infinite force in the realms of physics. That's why [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalistic]] physicists who [[Reductionism|reduce]] their explanations of physical reality to ''secondary (natural) causes'' assume that there is some new set of physical laws<ref name="Guth">{{cite web

|title=ALAN GUTH, Victor F. Weisskopf Professor of Physics

|title=ALAN GUTH, Victor F. Weisskopf Professor of Physics

|publisher=MIT department of physics

|publisher=MIT department of physics

== References ==

== References ==

{{Reflist}}

{{Reflist}}

[[Category:Science]]

[[Category:Science]]

[[Category:Philosophy of science]]

[[Category:Philosophy of science]]