1
edit
Changes
→Observations: new section
::Remember when the liberals had a hissy fit and everything was Bush Cheney? Then came Obama and the rise of the Tea Party. It wasn't until late 2009/early 2010 that the name Koch was on every liberals tongue. So the Koch's were a nothing until a coordinated attack from Obama and the NYT. Koch's are not influential in the movement, they are supporters no doubt with American for Prosperity. However, they are not the boogey-men liberals think control the movement. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:13, 10 November 2011 (EST)
::Remember when the liberals had a hissy fit and everything was Bush Cheney? Then came Obama and the rise of the Tea Party. It wasn't until late 2009/early 2010 that the name Koch was on every liberals tongue. So the Koch's were a nothing until a coordinated attack from Obama and the NYT. Koch's are not influential in the movement, they are supporters no doubt with American for Prosperity. However, they are not the boogey-men liberals think control the movement. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:13, 10 November 2011 (EST)
== Observations ==
Yeah, I would just like to say that, like their far left counterparts in the 1960's, the Tea Party are full of horse manure. (Rhetorical Question) Where were these same individuals when Bush was wasting money trying to find Osama bin Laden and Bush's other military adventures. Hate to say it, but the conservative movement has gotten full of horse manure and is out of touch with reality.