Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 bytes added ,  07:04, June 17, 2012
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
A proposition or theory is '''falsifiable''' if it is [[valid argument|logically valid]], regardless of soundness.<ref>[http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O87-falsifiability.html Definition] A Dictionary of Psychology, Andrew M. Colman, via encyclopedia.com</ref>  A proposal or theory that can never be shown to be false is not falsifiable.
+
A proposition or theory is '''falsifiable''' if it is [[valid argument|logically invalid]], regardless of soundness.<ref>[http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O87-falsifiability.html Definition] A Dictionary of Psychology, Andrew M. Colman, via encyclopedia.com</ref>  A proposal or theory that can never be shown to be false is not falsifiable.
    
To be considered [[scientific]], a [[hypothesis]] must be "[[falsifiable]]", i.e., capable of being proven false. If no one, not even the supporters of the hypothesis, can think of a way the hypothesis might be proven false, then most scientists would agree that it is not part of science (see [[pseudoscience]]). However, the [[history of science]] is full of examples whereby supporters of various theories refused to consider the prospect that someone might prove them wrong. Supporters of the [[evolution]] and [[global warming]] theories are like this.  
 
To be considered [[scientific]], a [[hypothesis]] must be "[[falsifiable]]", i.e., capable of being proven false. If no one, not even the supporters of the hypothesis, can think of a way the hypothesis might be proven false, then most scientists would agree that it is not part of science (see [[pseudoscience]]). However, the [[history of science]] is full of examples whereby supporters of various theories refused to consider the prospect that someone might prove them wrong. Supporters of the [[evolution]] and [[global warming]] theories are like this.  
SkipCaptcha
250

edits

Navigation menu