Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,636
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 751:
Line 751: − +
→Protection 2: typo
*Your point about Haiti doesn't prove that I have my hands in the cookie jar, sorry, (you probably assume that I want to blame Bush for his 2000 stance on nation building). However, it proves that you are able to see that people can have good reasons to oppose an official policy by the sitting president, and not because they oppose freedom, but because they think that the execution of the policy is poor, and that it doesn't achieve the purpose. As a reminder, lets repeat what I said a few weeks ago about why people oppose an official policy that claims to further human rights.
*Your point about Haiti doesn't prove that I have my hands in the cookie jar, sorry, (you probably assume that I want to blame Bush for his 2000 stance on nation building). However, it proves that you are able to see that people can have good reasons to oppose an official policy by the sitting president, and not because they oppose freedom, but because they think that the execution of the policy is poor, and that it doesn't achieve the purpose. As a reminder, lets repeat what I said a few weeks ago about why people oppose an official policy that claims to further human rights.
**Now "an official policy of a president" gets confused with "the US military core responsibilties". Order, please take note, you are not speaking with one someone swallows any line of Liberal crap because it sounds reasonable or intelligent. This kinda of meaningless nonsense isn't even worth the time discussing if you cannot present a coherent arguememnt.
**Now "an official policy of a president" gets confused with "the US military core responsibilties". Order, please take note, you are not speaking with someone who swallows any line of Liberal crap because it sounds reasonable or intelligent. This kinda of meaningless nonsense isn't even worth the time discussing if you cannot present a coherent arguememnt.
:# Firstly, you may or may not believe the claim that the administration does it for human rights, you may believe that the administration has ulterior motives
:# Firstly, you may or may not believe the claim that the administration does it for human rights, you may believe that the administration has ulterior motives