Talk:Homosexual Agenda
From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AmesG (Talk | contribs) at 06:06, March 12, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Scalia mentioned that in a dissenting opinion, which isn't binding law. --WOVcenter 00:59, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
WOV's got a point
Not only that, but this entire article is biased tripe. It presents the "homosexual agenda" from a one-sided perspective, and is filled with hate commentary. I recommend the entire thing for deletion.
Scalia's remark is regretful and a blemish on the pages of the U.S. Reporter, up there with Scott v. Sanford. But let's not expand it still further.
I have cleaned up biased and vitriolic language as best as I can, but this entry deserves deletion.
