Essay:Stem Cells

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jpatt (Talk | contribs) at 20:00, April 17, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

I noticed on the main page the news item about adult stem cells and the byline indicating how (in the opinion of the author(s)) the "abortion" industry "continues to insist on unsuccessful embryonic stem cell research in the United States" and it continues to say how "In the case of a recently successful adult stem cell project for diabetics, "the research was done in Brazil because U.S. doctors were not interested in the approach." Nonsense. I am not a researcher in that area, but know enough to understand that scientists go where the data leads them. If adult stem cells will work like other stem cells, people will try them and such efforts continue. It is utter nonsense to say that doctors in the US are not interested in that approach - perhaps they know a few things the author(s) do not know.

I'll wait to see how long this topic survives before I spend any time writing about this. The clock is, again, ticking. User:Seekcommon


It amazes me how much the media sings the tune for embryonic stem cells when zero has been accomplished. Probally has to do more with the Bush bashers (his veto), than any logical reason for promoting a big big maybe. John Kerry claims embryonic stem cells saved a little old mouse. Is that not the most pathetic augument ever--jp 16:00, 17 April 2007 (EDT)?
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&oldid=113420"