Russell's teapot
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gulik5 (talk | contribs) at 00:48, March 29, 2008. It may differ significantly from current revision.
'Russel's Teapot is an Argument first formulated by the philosopher Bertrand Russell as a reducto ad absurdiam of the notion that in an argument about the possible existence of an Unseen entity, the burden of proof is upon the skeptic.
| “ | If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.[1] | ” |