User talk:Mitt4Life

Worst Liberal Movies

I'm confused by the wording you added in your second and third edits after you added the movie Howl to the list on Essay:Worst Liberal Movies. Are you saying that the movie promotes the idea "the idea that writing about pornography is protected under the first amendment and has literary value." or are you arguing that in spite of its liberal qualities it is redeemed by this aspect? Obviously the first interpretation would be fine, but the second is countered on both counts by the Supreme Court ruling in Miller vs California ( available here:[1]) which upheld that pornography was not protected and by definition had no literary value. I wanted to ask which way you meant it before I blindly reverted your edits. Thanks, Fnarrow 17:30, 7 April 2013 (EDT)