Page history
March 26, 2017
November 11, 2008
September 16, 2008
September 5, 2008
Okay, I just solved BOTH the rendering problem AND the edit war about "numbers" vs. "real numbers" vs. "natural numbers"
-75
BillP: you're thinking of integers :)
+8
fix formatting
-1
Undo revision 511250 by Nerd (Talk)Natural numbers are 1,2,3...
-5
BillP: correct me if I'm wrong, but I do believe all of said numbers are considered as natural ... I am kind of a math nerd :P
+5
Undo revision 511246 by Nerd (Talk)commutative property works for natural, integer and rational numbers too
-5
Undid 1 revision by BillP (Talk); reverted to revision by DirkB (Talk); clarification necessary
+5
Undo revision 511242 by DirkB (Talk)Huh?
-5
Undo revision 511105 by BillP (Talk) I agree that we shouldn't overcomplicate things, but this was pushing it into the "Huh?" territory.
m+5
let's keep it simple
m-5
Again, link to wrong "factors".
m-4
wrong "product"
m-4
September 4, 2008
September 3, 2008
removing incorrect example
-121
Undo revision 509998 by Hello123 (Talk)
-44
no edit summary
+44
whoops
no edit summary
+121
no edit summary
m+1
4 + 5 = 5 + 4
+47
building on JohnI's last entry - thanks, John!
-65
=)
+129
corrected example
-43
Undo revision 509910 by Belgian (Talk)I'm dumb - revert own edit.
moved the example to where it belongs, it is not about commutative property
→Symbol: section needs rewriting - it causes more confusion than it explains anything
-556
2 * 3 = 6
+4
Not just in the example
-15
For most of my students "three times" means 3 instances of 2 are combined
no edit summary
m-25
we don't need the "spoken as" there - this is reference, not "math for dummies"
-19
"may be defined as" => too tentative
-15
September 2, 2008
September 1, 2008
August 31, 2008
that'll do
+10
where's the dot product symbol? I go find it to replace the asterisk I left in its place...
+441
no edit summary
+63
start simple, please
-1,137
confused and muddled - BARELY better than a red link
+10