SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,134
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Guidelines (view source)
Revision as of 21:33, September 4, 2012
, 21:33, September 4, 2012→Proposed Rewrite of 90/10 Rule
::::::The Conservapedia Commandments and guidelines don't make it all that clear what the site considers to be Conservatism, and what editing policy is. It's easy to see how a new user could've not realized they were making a mistake. That's why it's necessary to change the guidelines so people know what the rules are. He did make at least one productive edit that I can see, and therefore did not violate 90/10.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Galaxy&diff=prev&oldid=1001820] --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 17:30, 4 September 2012 (EDT)
::::::The Conservapedia Commandments and guidelines don't make it all that clear what the site considers to be Conservatism, and what editing policy is. It's easy to see how a new user could've not realized they were making a mistake. That's why it's necessary to change the guidelines so people know what the rules are. He did make at least one productive edit that I can see, and therefore did not violate 90/10.[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Galaxy&diff=prev&oldid=1001820] --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 17:30, 4 September 2012 (EDT)
::::::There is no policy or statement on the site that I know of that says "only Creationist views are allowed here and you get banned for opposing views". I don't know why you think he should've known that, and don't assume good faith about his intentions. It's highly necessary to change site guidelines so people at least know that these are the rules here, because otherwise banning like this for such comments is unjustifiable. --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 17:33, 4 September 2012 (EDT)