Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Guidelines (view source)
Revision as of 22:01, September 4, 2012
, 22:01, September 4, 2012→Conclusion
===Conclusion===
===Conclusion===
Ultimately, banning people for a 90/10 violation that never actually occurred like this just looks bad. It makes conservatives look bad, it makes Creationists look bad, and it makes Christians look bad. I don't like being made to look bad on three different fronts. --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 17:52, 4 September 2012 (EDT)
Ultimately, banning people for a 90/10 violation that never actually occurred like this just looks bad. It makes conservatives look bad, it makes Creationists look bad, and it makes Christians look bad. I don't like being made to look bad on three different fronts. --[[User:JZambrano|Joshua Zambrano]] 17:52, 4 September 2012 (EDT)
:Creationists look bad if they are forced to take false evolutionist info paraded as fact; conservatives look bad if they are forced to let liberals have their way; and Christians look bad if they are forced to have things thrown in their faces which are contrary to their beliefs. While I can concede JZ's point about this 90/10 incident, the fact of the matter was that the individual in question was blocked by a senior admin, and it is to that admin that one must go to to seek permission to get the block lifted.
:And keep in mind that this is a Christian, conservative website; anyone who wants to alter that small fact had best be editing somewhere else. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 18:01, 4 September 2012 (EDT)