Changes

no edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:     
There might be some Marxist 'fundementalists' who might feel that the evolutionary mechanisms described by Marx (as appropriated from Hegel)exclude Darwinian views.  'Thesis producing antithesis' is not the mechanism described by Darwin.  Nor is class warfare something that was described by Darwin.  But I think this would be more a view embraced by Stalinists trying to avoid the next purge  rather than less terrorized Marxist scholars since Stalin's demise.    I think western Marxist scholars especially would view Darwinism in the context of scientific explanation and hold it contingently true to the extent that it best explains existing evidence.    This view can be tested by referring to credible Marxist writings on the subject.  -McCheese
 
There might be some Marxist 'fundementalists' who might feel that the evolutionary mechanisms described by Marx (as appropriated from Hegel)exclude Darwinian views.  'Thesis producing antithesis' is not the mechanism described by Darwin.  Nor is class warfare something that was described by Darwin.  But I think this would be more a view embraced by Stalinists trying to avoid the next purge  rather than less terrorized Marxist scholars since Stalin's demise.    I think western Marxist scholars especially would view Darwinism in the context of scientific explanation and hold it contingently true to the extent that it best explains existing evidence.    This view can be tested by referring to credible Marxist writings on the subject.  -McCheese
 +
 +
How would Darwin's Theory of Evolution, a description of how the world is, conflict with Marx's communist theory, a description of how the world should be?--[[User:Άθεος|Άθεος]] 21:07, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
19

edits