Changes

Talk:Early voting (view source)

Revision as of 17:44, November 15, 2012

581 bytes added , 17:44, November 15, 2012

Line 43: Line 43:

:Yes, you're right. Oregon and Washington are 100% early voting ... and as result it is virtually impossible for a Republican to win there. Please add your good suggested edits to the content page.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:22, 13 November 2012 (EST)

::The problem is that they are not "swing states" or "battle ground states" so that they do not belong in this particular table. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 07:18, 15 November 2012 (EST)

+

::: You are correct that they are not swing states, though I hope that instead of burring information on Washington and Oregon at the bottom of the article, we could expand the table since the article is about early voting and not early voting in swing states. Also, for the record, I disagree with your use of quotes around early voting in that section since ever vote that is cast before election day is, by definition, early. In line with this common sense approach, I will edit that contribution accordingly. Thanks, [[User:WilliamWB|WilliamWB]] 12:44, 15 November 2012 (EST)

== re: claim that early voting undermines voter ID ==

WilliamWB

115

edits