| Line 242: |
Line 242: |
| | == Putting own content into external links == | | == Putting own content into external links == |
| | | | |
| − | Whilst some of your content on your blog is reasonable, I do think it is quite inappropriate that you ''linkspam'' various articles with links to your blog. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 21:53, 22 November 2012 (EST) | + | Whilst some of your content on your blog is reasonable, I do think some others would think that it is quite inappropriate that you ''linkspam'' various articles with links to your blog. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 21:53, 22 November 2012 (EST) |
| | :I didn't think of that. What do you suggest?[[User:BertSchlossberg|BertSchlossberg]] 21:55, 22 November 2012 (EST) | | :I didn't think of that. What do you suggest?[[User:BertSchlossberg|BertSchlossberg]] 21:55, 22 November 2012 (EST) |
| | :: I don't really know unfortunately, It just seems like it is a bit of a conflict of interest if you know what I mean. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 21:58, 22 November 2012 (EST) | | :: I don't really know unfortunately, It just seems like it is a bit of a conflict of interest if you know what I mean. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 21:58, 22 November 2012 (EST) |
| Line 253: |
Line 253: |
| | Bert, if your blog links contain pertinent instruction or education related to the topic at hand, then by all means post them. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:14, 23 November 2012 (EST) | | Bert, if your blog links contain pertinent instruction or education related to the topic at hand, then by all means post them. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:14, 23 November 2012 (EST) |
| | :Particularly if the content is no-controversial. Otherwise it reminds me of a certain Court of Appeal Judge who used to write a lot of activist ''obiter dicta'' in his dissenting judgements. Then, years later, in judgments he would refer back to his activist ''obiter'' and say "there has been a significant movement in legal opinion on this issue" and use it as justification for his own views. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 03:30, 23 November 2012 (EST) | | :Particularly if the content is no-controversial. Otherwise it reminds me of a certain Court of Appeal Judge who used to write a lot of activist ''obiter dicta'' in his dissenting judgements. Then, years later, in judgments he would refer back to his activist ''obiter'' and say "there has been a significant movement in legal opinion on this issue" and use it as justification for his own views. --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 03:30, 23 November 2012 (EST) |
| | + | :: As I said above your links are quite suitable, it's just that others may get a negative impression of having a person link to their personal bloggage and thus get a negative impression of conservapedia. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 03:39, 23 November 2012 (EST) |