SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,592
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: +
Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Anti-Christianity (view source)
Revision as of 14:17, December 26, 2012
, 14:17, December 26, 2012restored item using permalinks - please use permalinks to avoid arguments about item growing out of date due to subsequent changes
# Articles on the American Family Association[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Family_Association] and the Family Research Council[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Research_Council] call them hate groups based on opinions of the Southern Poverty Law Center on same-sex marriage, but the article on the Southern Poverty Law Center[http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center] does not have similar criticism of it.
# Articles on the American Family Association[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Family_Association] and the Family Research Council[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Research_Council] call them hate groups based on opinions of the Southern Poverty Law Center on same-sex marriage, but the article on the Southern Poverty Law Center[http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center] does not have similar criticism of it.
# Wikipedia's article on Extremism specifically points out Christians are commonly called extreme, ''"It is also not uncommon to necessarily define distinctions regarding extremist Christians as opposed to moderate Christians, as in countries such as the United States"'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Extremism&oldid=497191070]
# Wikipedia's article on Extremism specifically points out Christians are commonly called extreme, ''"It is also not uncommon to necessarily define distinctions regarding extremist Christians as opposed to moderate Christians, as in countries such as the United States"'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Extremism&oldid=497191070]
# The body of the [[Islamic terrorism]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islamic_terrorism&oldid=338611071|title=Islamic terrorism|work=Wikipedia|date=January 18, 2010|accessdate=December 26, 2012}}</ref> page opens with ''"Islamic terrorism" is itself a controversial phrase'' while the body of the article "Christianity and violence"<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christianity_and_violence&oldid=526775071</ref> page opened with ''Juergensmeyer wrote, "It is good to remember, however, that despite its central tenets of love and peace, Christianity - like most traditions - has always had a violent side."''
# [[Wikipedia]] has a lengthy entry on "Jesus H. Christ,"<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ</ref> a term that is an idiotic mockery of the [[Christian]] [[faith]]. [[Wikipedia]] calls the term "often humorous," "joking" and "comedic", and relishes in repeating disrespectful uses of the term, without admitting that the phrase is an anti-[[Christian]] mockery. Meanwhile, [[Wikipedia]] does not describe mockery of any other religion as "humorous".
# [[Wikipedia]] has a lengthy entry on "Jesus H. Christ,"<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ</ref> a term that is an idiotic mockery of the [[Christian]] [[faith]]. [[Wikipedia]] calls the term "often humorous," "joking" and "comedic", and relishes in repeating disrespectful uses of the term, without admitting that the phrase is an anti-[[Christian]] mockery. Meanwhile, [[Wikipedia]] does not describe mockery of any other religion as "humorous".
# Arguments for atheism are prominently featured in Wikipedia's atheism article, but Wikipedia's Christianity article does not mention Christian apologetics.
# Arguments for atheism are prominently featured in Wikipedia's atheism article, but Wikipedia's Christianity article does not mention Christian apologetics.