99
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 94:
Line 94: + +
→An idea.: Yeah, I think this is a good idea too
::I just checked and seems the user I responded to was banned for lying, which is unfortunate, but the suggestion seems sensible enough. [[User:PatrickMarion|PatrickMarion]] 12:01, 3 January 2013 (EST)PatrickMarion
::I just checked and seems the user I responded to was banned for lying, which is unfortunate, but the suggestion seems sensible enough. [[User:PatrickMarion|PatrickMarion]] 12:01, 3 January 2013 (EST)PatrickMarion
:::I think that the page in its current form detracts from the overall credibility of the website. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:39, 3 January 2013 (EST)
:::I think that the page in its current form detracts from the overall credibility of the website. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:39, 3 January 2013 (EST)
:::I thought so as well. I already rewrote the introduction and added some references for some claims that needed them and added section about how some claims have rooms for doubt. In fact, I found out at least one or two of the claims were outright conspiracy nonsense/parody virtually every news post and blog I came across without a noticeable political/religious slant one way or the other outright rejected them. Still looking through the references for some of the claims, and many of them come from some obviously biased sources with anti-Obama agendas. I'm no fan of the guy as a President, but some of what I've read was such disgusting mudslinging and demonization, even from some purported conservatives, I felt like throwing up. Any help would be appreciated in helping clean up this page.
:::[[User:PatrickMarion|PatrickMarion]] 14:51, 3 January 2013 (EST)PatrickMarion