| Line 81: |
Line 81: |
| | == Court decisions == | | == Court decisions == |
| | | | |
| − | About 5% of an American Government exam asks about specific, important U.S. Supreme Court cases. For example, a question could ask about the "one man, one vote" principle that we discussed in the last lecture. The two decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court that required state legislatures to draw their legislative districts in equal proportion, by population, to each other was ''Baker v. Carr'' (1962) and ''Reynolds v. Sims'' (1964). ''Baker v. Carr'' first held that the U.S. Supreme Court had the power to decide the challenge to state legislatures, and then ''Reynolds v. Sims'' was the decision that applied the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to require that both houses of a state legislature be apportioned on a population basis. | + | About 5% of an American Government exam asks about specific, important U.S. Supreme Court cases. For example, a question could ask about the "one man, one vote" principle that we discussed in the last lecture. The two decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court that required state legislatures to draw their legislative districts in equal proportion, by population, to each other was ''Baker v. Carr'' (1962) and ''Reynolds v. Sims'' (1964). ''Baker v. Carr'' first held that the U.S. Supreme Court had the power to decide this issue concerning state legislatures, and then ''Reynolds v. Sims'' was the decision that applied the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to require that both houses of a state legislature be apportioned on the basis of population (rather than geography). |
| | | | |
| − | This was important for several reasons. First, the U.S. Supreme Court was using the 14th Amendment to tell state legislatures what they could do. That was unheard of before the 14th Amendment passed. Originally, States considered themselves to be more powerful than the federal government, and States did not expect them to be subjected to being told what to do by federal courts. Indeed, the 11th Amendment was passed in order to limit the power of federal courts with respect to the States. | + | This was important for several reasons. First, the U.S. Supreme Court used the 14th Amendment to tell state legislatures what they could do. That was unheard of before the 14th Amendment passed. Originally, States considered themselves to be more powerful than the federal government, and States did not expect federal courts to tell them what they could do. Indeed, the 11th Amendment was passed in order to limit the power of federal courts with respect to the States. |
| | | | |
| − | But the "one man, one vote" also made high-population areas, such as cities, more powerful in State legislatures, which helped Democrats but hurt Republicans. The court decision shifted some power at the State level from Republicans, who are more popular in rural areas, to Democrats, who are more popular in cities. | + | But the "one man, one vote" also made high-population areas, such as cities, more powerful in State legislatures, which helped Democrats and hurt Republicans. These court decisions shifted some power at the State level from Republicans, who are more popular in rural areas, to Democrats, who are more popular in cities. |
| | | | |
| − | State legislatures can still engage in "gerrymandering" in drawing legislative districts, both for State legislatures and for Congress, in ways to favor one political party or the other. Obama, a Democrat, won the most votes in Pennsylvania, but due to gerrymandering Republicans won most of the congressional districts. | + | State legislatures can still engage in "gerrymandering" in drawing legislative districts, both for State legislatures and for Congress, in ways to favor one political party or the other. Obama, a Democrat, won the most votes in Pennsylvania but, due to gerrymandering, Republicans won most of the congressional districts. |
| | | | |
| | == Public Policy and Everything Else == | | == Public Policy and Everything Else == |