Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
→It is a meaningless, almost nonsensical, statement that purports to relate all matter to light.: new section
::If those are my biggest problems then I'm fairly happy :-) Now corrected. [[User:Peterw|Peterw]] 09:57, 11 January 2013 (EST)
::If those are my biggest problems then I'm fairly happy :-) Now corrected. [[User:Peterw|Peterw]] 09:57, 11 January 2013 (EST)
== It is a meaningless, almost nonsensical, statement that purports to relate all [[matter]] to [[light]]. ==
I changed this sentence to ''It is a statement that purports to relate all [[matter]] to [[energy]]. ''. My reasons:
*The reader should decide for himself whether the statement is meaningless or nonsensical
*The older version showed a misunderstanding of [[proportionality]]: in a proportionality, two variables (in this case matter and energy) are related by use of a constant (in this case c²). The older version implied a relationship between matter and the proportionality constant - which is nonsense. As Aschlafly stated above ''"Mass is not a function of the speed of light."'' Here he is right - as the function of a constant would be necessarily constant itself, but we know that there are different masses....
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:58, 14 January 2013 (EST)