Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Talk:Conservapedia proven right (view source)
Revision as of 23:43, January 15, 2013
, 23:43, January 15, 2013→Item on Armstrong is spot on: according to my memory: →Item on Armstrong is somewhat ridiculous
:You're welcome to add more references, but the predictions and outcomes are so clear and well-known that even more references are hardly necessary.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:10, 15 January 2013 (EST)
:You're welcome to add more references, but the predictions and outcomes are so clear and well-known that even more references are hardly necessary.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:10, 15 January 2013 (EST)
== Item on Armstrong is spot on ==
== Item on Armstrong is somewhat ridiculous ==
Lance Armstrong was stripped from his titles in August 2012, so adding him in September 2012 to the list of overrated sport-starts doesn't take a visionary... --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:46, 15 January 2013 (EST)
Lance Armstrong was stripped from his titles in August 2012, so adding him in September 2012 to the list of overrated sport-starts doesn't take a visionary... --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:46, 15 January 2013 (EST)