Changes

Line 24: Line 24:  
::::::::Dvergne is right.  Ad hominem remarks are unenlightening, and disfavored on this site.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:36, 22 January 2013 (EST)
 
::::::::Dvergne is right.  Ad hominem remarks are unenlightening, and disfavored on this site.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:36, 22 January 2013 (EST)
 
:::::::::I would tend to agree. My apologies for any past transgressions, and I would greatly appreciate it if you'd pass on your condemnation for ad hominem attacks and simple personal insults on to User:Conservative. Thanks you. --[[User:DonnyC|DonnyC]] 19:51, 22 January 2013 (EST)
 
:::::::::I would tend to agree. My apologies for any past transgressions, and I would greatly appreciate it if you'd pass on your condemnation for ad hominem attacks and simple personal insults on to User:Conservative. Thanks you. --[[User:DonnyC|DonnyC]] 19:51, 22 January 2013 (EST)
 +
::::::::::Well, just to name a few, you are the one who keeps claiming that there is a conspiracy to keep players out of positions based on their politics, claimed that a satirical piece written about Kim Jong Il's golfing prowess was legitimate and who claims that the expert management of a rookie player who performed to his potential is evidence that the best of the public is better than experts (or something just as nonsensical).  I stand by my comment that you are essentially clueless when it comes to sports.  If you consider that to be an ad hominem, remember that you yourself have frequently called people "clueless" when they disagree with you on something.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:54, 22 January 2013 (EST)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
907

edits