Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
→Changes: I should probably just stop here.
:I haven't looked at the page yet. When I was an active Mediator at Wikipedia I often commented before taking a look. May as well get all my cards on the table before playing the game. Okay, here goes (dons spacesuit, enters time machine). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:20, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
:I haven't looked at the page yet. When I was an active Mediator at Wikipedia I often commented before taking a look. May as well get all my cards on the table before playing the game. Okay, here goes (dons spacesuit, enters time machine). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:20, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
==Point of view==
What's that logical fallacy called again, [[begging the question]]? Anyway, I only got this far in the article history:
:Recent findings have shown that the Tyrannosaurus rex is a distant cousin to the modern chicken. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tyrannosaurus_rex&diff=next&oldid=72413]
That sort of wording is unsuitable because:
#Saying that something "has been shown to be true" is the same as endorsing the view, i.e., calling it "[[knowledge]]" (justified true belief).
#Scientists like to take a few months or years to kick around a new idea before deciding whether to accept it or not.
Shall I stop here, or continue my analysis? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 12:28, 13 April 2007 (EDT)