Changes

→‎Point of view: May I strike out the irrelevant part of this comment?
Line 234: Line 234:     
::::I'll agree that maybe the original wording wasn't the best, but I still think it should be included in the article as it does pertain to the T Rex.  Also, if the YEC section is to be included, why not information that supports/presents the evolution idea too?  
 
::::I'll agree that maybe the original wording wasn't the best, but I still think it should be included in the article as it does pertain to the T Rex.  Also, if the YEC section is to be included, why not information that supports/presents the evolution idea too?  
−
::::I'd still like an explanation from the webmaster why he removed it and ignored my questions.  I hate non-confrontation. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:12, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
+
::::<s>I'd still like an explanation from the webmaster why he removed it and ignored my questions.  I hate non-confrontation.</s> [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:12, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits